Why Are Democrat Activist Judges Advocating for Criminal Illegal Aliens?

By The Blog Source

According to data compiled by The Gavel, judges nominated by Democrat presidents have been assigned 72% of the over 200 lawsuits contesting significant moves by the Trump administration. The majority of these cases are being handled by individuals who were appointed by Obama and Biden, two of President Trump's most formidable political opponents.

President Trump has resorted to naming several of the judges as “Democrat Activists” and asserting that they lack the authority to dictate his administration's operations in response to the deluge of injunctions they have issued and the plaintiffs' efforts to present their cases in favorable courts.

The imbalance is intentional. Along the coasts, plaintiffs frequently file cases in "friendly" courts where Democrat appointees are more likely to hear them, such as in Boston, San Francisco, and Seattle.

The days of politically contentious lawsuits centering on North Texas's single-judge divisions during the Biden administration are long gone. A few examples of the most prevalent places:

The promise to restore order to the United States' immigration system was central to President Trump's resounding victory in the November election. Misusing their power, activist judges are presently preventing his administration from moving forward.

Just one month into his presidency, President Trump's team has already amassed 14 countrywide injunctions—nearly matching the total number of injunctions received by the Biden administration in its first three years. Like their counterparts from Obama's first term, left-wing justices like James Boasberg of the Washington, D.C. federal district court have been staunchly opposed to the president.

San Francisco Judge Edward Chen blocked the Trump administration's decision to revoke Temporary Protected Status, which had been granted to Venezuelan nationals in a prior case, even though judicial review of such matters is prohibited by law. A democratic crisis has ensued because the president is practically unable to exercise the power that the Constitution has bestowed upon him to fulfill the desires of the people who elected him.

These disgraceful judges are trying to derail the will of the over 77 million people who voted for Trump in the last election by interfering with the president's plenary powers, which are both illegal and unconstitutional. According to Article IV, Section 4 of the United States Constitution, it is the responsibility of the federal government to guarantee that every "State in this Union has a Republican Form of Government" and to "protect each of them against INVASION."

To join the Diamond and Silk Monthly Supporter Program, visit http://SupportDiamondandSilk.com.
Lindell TV, VOCL, ChatDit, Rumble, TruthSocial, and Diamond and Silk Media are all excellent ways to stay connected with Diamond and Silk.